![]() |
| Home | About Us | Partners & Associates | Art & Media | News | Contact Us |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
The Alternative Investment Market - flotation without tears The first of a two part look at the Growth of AIM by Keith Hatchick (I) |
|
|
The most normal situation is that of a company with a trading history of at least three years showing recurring profits before tax of upwards of, say, £250,000 (there is no minimum though). A company is unlikely to he attractive to a nomad unless it can procure a market capitalisation of at least £3m and from a nombro's stance there is likely to be little institutional interest with one of less than £7m. Indeed there are a number of nomads and nombros who will not take an issuer to AIM without a minimum market capitalisation of £10m. Since the p/e of most companies listed on AIM is between 10 and 14 this would require annual profits of at least £700,000. The candidate or members of its group should not have any recent insolvency history and its directors similarly should not been directors of any such troubled companies. The record of directors, both executive and non executive, is frequently taken as an indication of the past health and prognosis of a candidate. Chapter 16 does have rules relating both to disclosure and suitability, but it is more frequently a concern of the nomad and nombro since the marketing of a share may be tainted when such disclosures are made.
|
A frequent question clients ask their advisers is what type of concerns best lend themselves to AIM Admission. There is no quick answer, but the following categories can be cited with confidence: - companies in fast growing businesses such as computer technology or telecommunications (i.e. the 'expand or die' philosophy).
|
|
-
Home -
About Us -
The Partners -
The Associates -
Art & Media -
News -
Contact Us - - Job Opportunities - Terms of use / Disclaimer - Publications - |
| Copyright © 2007 Marshall Hatchick Solicitors. All rights reserved |